Scopd

Spencer Pratt Attacks Gavin Newsom Over Paramount Lawsuit

· news

The Hollywood Hypocrisy of Spencer Pratt’s Rant

Spencer Pratt, a former reality TV star turned advocate for Los Angeles’ film industry, has released a scathing 10-minute TikTok video attacking California Governor Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta. In the video, Pratt claims they are waging a “war on Hollywood” by trying to block Paramount’s $110 billion merger with Warner Bros. Discovery.

However, beneath the surface of Pratt’s outburst lies a more insidious issue: the hypocrisy of California’s treatment of the film industry. While he criticizes Newsom and Bonta for allegedly driving productions out of town, Pratt overlooks the state’s own role in increasing costs and making it harder for studios to operate within its borders.

The 12-state coalition, led by California, has filed a lawsuit against Paramount, citing concerns over the potential impact on competition and the future of Hollywood. However, Pratt dismisses these concerns as “petty politics,” implying that Newsom and Bonta are motivated by a desire to cripple the industry for personal gain.

Pratt’s video relies heavily on cherry-picked facts and half-truths. He points out that Amazon wasn’t named in the lawsuit despite being involved in several major blockbusters, but fails to mention that Amazon’s acquisition of MGM has raised concerns from industry insiders over its potential impact on competition.

Furthermore, Pratt makes a curious argument about the decline of production following Disney’s acquisition of Fox. He notes that this was due not to the merger itself, but rather to external factors such as the COVID pandemic and Gavin Newsom’s lockdown policies. This is a classic case of blaming the victim – in this case, the state government.

The real issue at hand is not whether Paramount or Warner Bros. Discovery will emerge from this merger unscathed, but what it says about California’s priorities. Is it truly committed to preserving the film industry, or is it more interested in using its regulatory powers to further its own interests?

Pratt himself notes that “This isn’t the ’80s anymore.” The film industry has changed dramatically since then, with streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime now dominating the market. However, rather than embracing this new reality and finding ways to adapt, California seems intent on clinging to outdated models of production.

In the end, Pratt’s rant is less about defending Hollywood and more about promoting his own interests as a Los Angeles mayoral hopeful. It’s a desperate attempt to distract from his own failures in local politics and shift the focus onto more national issues. But Californians shouldn’t be fooled – this is just another example of the self-serving opportunism that has come to define Pratt’s career.

California will continue to play a major role in shaping the future of Hollywood, but whether it does so in a way that benefits the industry as a whole or simply serves its own interests remains to be seen. One thing is certain: Spencer Pratt’s antics won’t be enough to save the day.

Reader Views

  • CM
    Columnist M. Reid · opinion columnist

    The Spencer Pratt spectacle is just a smokescreen for the real issue: California's catastrophic business climate. While Pratt rails against Newsom and Bonta, he conveniently ignores the state's own role in driving up costs through policies like the "Mandatory Minimum Wage" hike, which has made it nearly impossible for studios to afford shooting on location. It's time to call out the hypocrisy – we can't simply blame the politicians while ignoring our own hand in making LA unfriendly to film production.

  • RJ
    Reporter J. Avery · staff reporter

    What's missing from Spencer Pratt's rant is any acknowledgment of Paramount's own culpability in driving up costs and sparking this lawsuit. The company has been quietly expanding its LA studio footprint while threatening to relocate productions elsewhere if regulatory hurdles aren't cleared. Meanwhile, the coalition's concerns about the merger's impact on competition are legitimate – as evidenced by the increasing dominance of a few big players like Disney and WarnerMedia. A more nuanced conversation would recognize that both sides have valid points, but Pratt's simplistic, "Hollywood vs California" framing only serves to distract from the complexities at play.

  • AD
    Analyst D. Park · policy analyst

    While Pratt's diatribe against Newsom and Bonta has sparked debate about Hollywood's influence in California politics, one aspect of this controversy gets lost in the fray: the industry's failure to adapt to shifting economic realities. Paramount's $110 billion merger with Warner Bros. Discovery is a symptom of the larger issue – studios' reluctance to invest in sustainable production models. By blaming state regulators rather than addressing their own practices, Pratt and his ilk perpetuate a narrative that obscures the need for meaningful industry reforms.

Related articles

More from Scopd

View as Web Story →